桃子视频

Is Your Threat Assessment Team Missing a Critical Voice? 4 Things to Consider

Written by Thom Jones

Learn about our Editorial Process

No key points have been set for this post.

School safety today demands more than policies and protocols鈥攊t requires people. Effective threat assessment is a human-centered process, and ensuring the right people are at the table can make all the difference in identifying concerns early and responding appropriately.

In a recent 桃子视频 Ambassador Program roundtable discussion, Thom Jones, Senior Vice President of Detection & Prevention at 桃子视频 and a former school administrator with over 19 years of experience, shared key insights into how multidisciplinary teams help schools respond with confidence and care. Drawing on case data from tens of thousands of threat assessments across the country, Thom provided helpful guidance on enhancing school safety using a threat assessment model and building multidisciplinary teams that work鈥攁nd why diverse roles matter.

Here are four things to consider as you reflect on your own school鈥檚 threat assessment team.

1. Threat assessment works best as a collaboration, not a checklist.

Threat assessment isn鈥檛 just about following a form鈥攊t鈥檚 about bringing the right perspectives together to understand the full context of a student鈥檚 behavior. Teams work best when roles are clearly defined, consistently involved, and collaboratively engaged.

“A true threat assessment process is proactive, not reactive. It brings together different viewpoints so you can see the full picture of a student’s behavior鈥攏ot just the incident.” 鈥 Thom Jones

If your team meetings are brief, infrequent, or dominated by a single voice, consider how you might expand participation and deepen collaboration.

2. Even low-level threats benefit from law enforcement insight.

It鈥檚 a common misconception that law enforcement only needs to be involved when a threat is clearly imminent or criminal. But real-world data鈥攁nd experience鈥攕uggest otherwise.

Recent data from 桃子视频鈥檚 national CSTAG case reviews shows that:

  • Only 1.6% of threat cases involve students actively preparing to carry out a threat
  • Only 1.6% involve students who are suicidal

That means over 98% of threat cases present opportunities for early, proactive intervention鈥攁nd law enforcement can play a key role in those moments.

“The cases that make headlines usually had red flags long before the big incident. If law enforcement isn鈥檛 part of the early conversation, we lose that opportunity to intervene upstream.” 鈥 Thom Jones

When present from the start, your School Resource Officer (SRO) or law enforcement partner can help the team assess access-to-weapons risk, investigate off-campus concerns, and connect students and families to external supports. Their role isn鈥檛 just about enforcement鈥攊t鈥檚 about insight.

3. Support-based roles are just as essential as safety roles.

Behavioral concerns often stem from underlying issues like trauma, isolation, or emotional distress. That鈥檚 why mental health professionals are such a vital part of any school threat assessment team.

“You can鈥檛 suspend your way out of a mental health crisis. Having someone at the table who understands behavioral health is non-negotiable.” 鈥 Thom Jones

School counselors, psychologists, and social workers help ensure that your response isn鈥檛 just about discipline鈥攂ut about connection and care.

If your team doesn鈥檛 currently include mental health staff, consider how to incorporate them more fully or connect with external partners who can offer this lens.

4. Culture matters鈥攅specially when it comes to early reporting.

Even with the best team in place, your ability to prevent harm depends on whether students and staff feel safe bringing concerns forward. Trusted adults, anonymous reporting options, and a clear, consistent process can make all the difference.

“The cases you never hear about? Those are the success stories. Someone spoke up, the team responded, and a student got the help they needed. That only happens when people trust the process.” 鈥 Thom Jones

Schools that normalize early intervention鈥攚ithout fear of overreaction鈥攁re the ones best positioned to prevent escalation.

Final Takeaway: Threat assessment is not about policing鈥攊t鈥檚 about preventing. And prevention requires a team that reflects the many ways students show us when something鈥檚 wrong.

Your team doesn鈥檛 have to be perfect to be effective. But it should be multidisciplinary by design, collaborative in practice, and committed to early action rooted in care.

鈥淓very voice at the table matters. When your team works as one, you鈥檙e not just managing threats. You鈥檙e building trust. You鈥檙e protecting people.鈥 鈥 Thom Jones

Free Guide: Behavioral Threat Assessment Starter Kit

Comprehensive threat assessment programs are a necessity for violence prevention in schools. It is your critical first step in preventing harm and providing support for students on a path to self-harm and harm to others.


<a href="/blog/author/tjones/" target="_self">Thom Jones</a>

Thom Jones

A former middle school administrator with more than 19 years of experience, Thom brings extensive knowledge in school operations and safety needs. His proficiency in threat detection & prevention comes from close collaboration with today鈥檚 leading experts, including Dr. Dewey Cornell, Dr. Scott Poland, Dr. Marisa Randazzo and countless practitioners at districts across the country. Thom brings together district needs and industry expertise to help shape the direction and development of impactful solutions designed to help create safe learning environments 鈥 physically, socially and emotionally.

Building relationships with today鈥檚 educators, Thom and his team stay on the leading edge of the growth and evolution of school safety. His efforts focus on the ways we can help schools identify and manage students who may need additional emphasis on emotional safety and a proactive approach to preventing harm to themselves or others.

Related Articles